A Comparison of Galaxy Group Luminosity Functions from Semi-Analytic Models

Abstract

Semi-analytic models (SAMs) are currently one of the primary tools with which to model statistically significant ensembles of galaxies. The underlying physical prescriptions inherent to each SAM are, in many cases, different from one another. Several SAMs have been applied to the dark matter merger trees extracted from the Millennium Run, including those associated with the well-known Munich and Durham lineages. We compare the predicted luminosity distributions of galaxy groups using four publicly available SAMs (De Lucia et al. 2006; Bower et al. 2006; Bertone et al. 2007; Font et al. 2008), in order to explore a galactic environment in which the models have not been explored to the same degree as they have in the field or in rich clusters. We identify a characteristic "wiggle" in the group galaxy luminosity function generated using the De Lucia et al. (2006) SAM, that is not present in the Durham-based models, consistent to some degree with observations. However, a comparison between conditional luminosity functions of groups between the models and observations of Yang et al. (2007) suggest that neither model is a particularly good match. The luminosity function wiggle is interpreted as the result of the two-mode AGN feedback implementation used in the Munich models, which itself results in flattened magnitude gap distribution. An associated analysis of the magnitude gap distribution between first- and second-ranked group galaxies shows that while the Durham models yield distributions with approximately equal luminosity first- and second-ranked galaxies, in agreement with observations, the De Lucia et al. models favours the scenario in which the second-ranked galaxy is approximately one magnitude fainter than the primary,especially when the dynamic range of the mock data is limited to 3 magnitudes.

16 pages, 12 figures, 4 tables, accepted MNRAS; Revision:removed bold paragraphs in Sections 3.1 and 6

References in corpus (14)

• The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies
• A primer on hierarchical galaxy formation: the semi-analytical approach
• Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4: II. halo occupation statistics
• Towards a Concordant Model of Halo Occupation Statistics
• Properties of Galaxy Groups in the SDSS: II.- AGN Feedback and Star Formation Truncation
• The recycling of gas and metals in galaxy formation: predictions of a dynamical feedback model
• The Mass Assembly of Fossil Groups of Galaxies in the Millennium Simulation
• The Fossil Phase in the Life of a Galaxy Group
• Compact groups in theory and practice - III. Compact groups of galaxies in the Sixth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Satellite Galaxies and Fossil Groups in the Millennium Simulation
• Groups of galaxies in the SDSS Data Release 5. A group-finder and a catalogue
• Compact groups in theory and practice - I. The spatial properties of compact groups
• Are fossil groups a challenge of the Cold Dark Matter paradigm?
• The scale dependence of mass assembly in galaxies

Cited by in corpus (9)

• Structure Finding in Cosmological Simulations: The State of Affairs
• An HI Survey of Six Local Group Analogs. II. HI properties of group galaxies
• Properties of simulated Milky Way-mass galaxies in loose group and field environments
• The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Dependence of halo occupation on stellar mass
• Groups in the Millennium Simulation and in SDSS DR7
• Assessing the reliability of Friends-of-Friends groups on the future Javalambre Physics of the Accelerating Universe Astrophysical Survey
• Compact groups from semi-analytical models of galaxy formation -- I: a comparative study of frequency and nature
• Cosmic Pathways for Compact Groups in the Milli-Millennium Simulation
• Evolution of Galaxy Types and HI Gas in Hickson Compact Groups