The origin of peak-offsets in weak-lensing maps

Abstract

Centroid positions of peaks identified in weak lensing mass maps often show offsets with respect to other means of identifying halo centres, like position of the brightest cluster galaxy or X-ray emission centroid. Here we study the effect of projected large-scale structure (LSS), smoothing of mass maps, and shape noise on the weak lensing peak positions. Additionally we compare the offsets in mass maps to those found in parametric model fits. Using ray-tracing simulations through the Millennium Run $N$-body simulation, we find that projected LSS does not alter the weak-lensing peak position within the limits of our simulations' spatial resolution, which exceeds the typical resolution of weak lensing maps. We conclude that projected LSS, although a major contaminant for weak-lensing mass estimates, is not a source of confusion for identifying halo centres. The typically reported offsets in the literature are caused by a combination of shape noise and smoothing alone. This is true for centroid positions derived both from mass maps and model fits.

6 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS, significant additions to v1

References in corpus (10)

• A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter
• On the Accuracy of Weak Lensing Cluster Mass Reconstructions
• Revealing the properties of dark matter in the merging cluster MACSJ0025.4-1222
• A Statistical Study of Weak Lensing by Triaxial Dark Matter Halos: Consequences for Parameter Estimation
• GaBoDS: The Garching-Bonn Deep Survey -- IX. A sample of 158 shear-selected mass concentration candidates
• Effects of large-scale structure on the accuracy of weak lensing mass measurements
• Weak lensing survey of galaxy clusters in the CFHTLS Deep
• Noisy weak-lensing convergence peak statistics near clusters of galaxies and beyond
• Weak lensing study of dark matter filaments and application to the binary cluster A 222 and A 223
• BLOX: The Bonn Lensing, Optical, and X-ray selected galaxy clusters -- I. Cluster catalog construction

Cited by in corpus (33)

• Weighing the Giants - I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images
• Galaxies in X-ray Groups. II. A Weak Lensing Study of Halo Centering
• Cluster Mass Calibration at High Redshift: HST Weak Lensing Analysis of 13 Distant Galaxy Clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Survey
• Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect and X-ray Scaling Relations from Weak-Lensing Mass Calibration of 32 SPT Selected Galaxy Clusters
• The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): X-ray Observable-to-Mass-and-Redshift Relations of Galaxy Clusters and Groups with Weak-Lensing Mass Calibration from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey
• Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• Miscentring in Galaxy Clusters: Dark Matter to Brightest Cluster Galaxy Offsets in 10,000 SDSS Clusters
• A large sample of shear selected clusters from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S16A wide field mass maps
• Weak lensing mass map and peak statistics in Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Stripe 82 survey
• Scatter and bias in weak lensing selected clusters
• Weak lensing analysis of RXC J2248.7-4431
• The 400d Galaxy Cluster Survey weak lensing programme: III: Evidence for consistent WL and X-ray masses at $z\approx 0.5$
• A detection of wobbling Brightest Cluster Galaxies within massive galaxy clusters
• Ultimate age-dating method for galaxy groups; clues from the Millennium Simulations
• Mass calibration of distant SPT galaxy clusters through expanded weak lensing follow-up observations with HST, VLT & Gemini-South
• The merger history of the complex cluster Abell 1758: a combined weak lensing and spectroscopic view
• The offsets between galaxies and their dark matter in Lambda-CDM
• The dark matter distribution in z~0.5 clusters of galaxies. I : Determining scaling relations with weak lensing masses
• SARCS strong-lensing galaxy groups: II - mass-concentration relation and strong-lensing bias
• Precise weak lensing constraints from deep high-resolution $K_{\mathrm{s}}$ images: VLT/HAWK-I analysis of the super-massive galaxy cluster RCS2$J$232727.7$-$020437 at $z=0.70$
• The 400d Galaxy Cluster Survey weak lensing programme: II: Weak lensing study of seven clusters with MMT/Megacam
• Dark Matter Astrometry: Accuracy of sub-halo positions for the measurement of self-interaction cross sections
• Dark matter distribution in the merging cluster Abell 2163
• Comparing Dark Energy Survey and HST-CLASH observations of the galaxy cluster RXC J2248.7-4431: implications for stellar mass versus dark matter
• Effects of center offset and noise on weak-lensing derived concentration-mass relation of dark matter halos
• SARCS strong lensing galaxy groups: I - optical, weak lensing, and scaling laws
• Revising the merger scenario of the galaxy cluster Abell 1644: a new gas poor structure discovered by weak gravitational lensing
• The matter distribution in z ~ 0.5 redshift clusters of galaxies. II : The link between dark and visible matter
• On the reliability of photometric and spectroscopic tracers of halo relaxation
• A major galaxy cluster merger caught by eROSITA: weak lensing mass distribution and kinematic description
• Correlation between centre offsets and gas velocity dispersion of galaxy clusters in cosmological simulations
• The Wendelstein Weak Lensing (WWL) pathfinder: Accurate weak lensing masses for Planck clusters
• Dissecting the Strong-lensing Galaxy Cluster MS 0440.5+0204. I. The Mass Density Profile