Knot concordance and homology cobordism
arXiv:1102.5730 · doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-2013-11471-1
Abstract
We consider the question: "If the zero-framed surgeries on two oriented knots in the 3-sphere are integral homology cobordant, preserving the homology class of the positive meridians, are the knots themselves concordant?" We show that this question has a negative answer in the smooth category, even for topologically slice knots. To show this we first prove that the zero-framed surgery on K is Z-homology cobordant to the zero-framed surgery on many of its winding number one satellites P(K). Then we prove that in many cases the tau and s-invariants of K and P(K) differ. Consequently neither tau nor s is an invariant of the smooth homology cobordism class of the zero-framed surgery. We also show, that a natural rational version of this question has a negative answer in both the topological and smooth categories, by proving similar results for K and its (p,1)-cables.
15 pages, 8 figures
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (18)
- Injectivity of satellite operators in knot concordance
- Knot traces and concordance
- Satellite operators as group actions on knot concordance
- Satellite operators with distinct iterates in smooth concordance
- Shake slice and shake concordant knots
- Shake genus and slice genus
- On the Upsilon invariant and satellite knots
- The geometry of the knot concordance space
- Concordance of knots in
- On rational sliceness of Miyazaki's fibered, amphicheiral knots
- Using rational homology circles to construct rational homology balls
- Ozsváth-Szabó invariants of contact surgeries
- Classification of torus bundles that bound rational homology circles
- Surgeries on torus knots, rational balls, and cabling
- Fibered knots with the same -surgery and the slice-ribbon conjecture
- Slice knots which bound punctured Klein bottles
- Linear independence of cables in the knot concordance group
- Action of the Mazur pattern up to topological concordance