The Importance of Scale for Spatial-Confounding Bias and Precision of Spatial Regression Estimators

Abstract

Residuals in regression models are often spatially correlated. Prominent examples include studies in environmental epidemiology to understand the chronic health effects of pollutants. I consider the effects of residual spatial structure on the bias and precision of regression coefficients, developing a simple framework in which to understand the key issues and derive informative analytic results. When unmeasured confounding introduces spatial structure into the residuals, regression models with spatial random effects and closely-related models such as kriging and penalized splines are biased, even when the residual variance components are known. Analytic and simulation results show how the bias depends on the spatial scales of the covariate and the residual: one can reduce bias by fitting a spatial model only when there is variation in the covariate at a scale smaller than the scale of the unmeasured confounding. I also discuss how the scales of the residual and the covariate affect efficiency and uncertainty estimation when the residuals are independent of the covariate. In an application on the association between black carbon particulate matter air pollution and birth weight, controlling for large-scale spatial variation appears to reduce bias from unmeasured confounders, while increasing uncertainty in the estimated pollution effect.

arXiv commentPublished in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-STS326 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

Cited by in corpus (10)

• Spatial+: a novel approach to spatial confounding
• Eigenvector spatial filtering for large data sets: fixed and random effects approaches
• Restricted Spatial Regression Methods: Implications for Inference
• A class of covariate-dependent spatiotemporal covariance functions for the analysis of daily ozone concentration
• Generalized Spatial and Spatiotemporal Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity
• Evaluating recent methods to overcome spatial confounding
• Selecting a Scale for Spatial Confounding Adjustment
• Bayesian Principal Component Regression model with spatial effects for forest inventory under small field sample size
• Additive multivariate Gaussian processes for joint species distribution modeling with heterogeneous data
• Accounting for spatial confounding in epidemiological studies with individual-level exposures: An exposure-penalized spline approach