Comment on "Symmetries and Interaction Coefficients of Kelvin waves" [arXiv:1005.4575] by Lebedev and L'vov
arXiv:1006.1789 · doi:10.1007/s10909-010-0242-z
Abstract
We comment on the claim by Lebedev and L'vov [arXiv:1005.4575] that the symmetry with respect to a tilt of a quantized vortex line does not yet prohibit coupling between Kelvin waves and the large-scale slope of the line. Ironically, the counterexample of an effective scattering vertex in the local induction approximation (LIA) attempted by Lebedev and L'vov invalidates their logic all by itself being a notoriously known example of how symmetries impose stringent constraints on kelvon kinetics---not only the coupling in question but the kinetics in general are absent within LIA. We further explain that the mistake arises from confusing symmetry properties of a specific mathematical representation in terms of the canonical vortex position field w(z) = x(z) + iy(z), which explicitly breaks the tilt symmetry due to an arbitrary choice of the z-axis, with those of the real physical system recovered in final expressions.
comment on arXiv:1005.4575, version accepted in JLTP with minimal changes: abstract added
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Vortices and turbulence in trapped atomic condensates
- Structure of quantum vortex tangle in He-4 counterflow turbulence
- Kelvin-wave cascade and dissipation in low-temperature superfluids vortices
- Kelvin-wave turbulence in superfluids
- The Kelvin-wave cascade in the vortex filament model
- Symmetry of Kelvin-wave dynamics and the Kelvin-wave cascade in the T=0 superfluid turbulence
- On role of symmetries in Kelvin wave turbulence
- Comment on "Symmetry of Kelvin-wave dynamics and the Kelvin-wave cascade in the T = 0 superfluid turbulence" [arXiv:1201.3188]
- Reply to Comment on "Symmetry of Kelvin-wave dynamics and the Kelvin-wave cascade in the T=0 superfluid turbulence" [arXiv:1208.4593]