Critical mass and the dependency of research quality on group size
arXiv:1006.0928 · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0282-9
Abstract
Academic research groups are treated as complex systems and their cooperative behaviour is analysed from a mathematical and statistical viewpoint. Contrary to the naive expectation that the quality of a research group is simply given by the mean calibre of its individual scientists, we show that intra-group interactions play a dominant role. Our model manifests phenomena akin to phase transitions which are brought about by these interactions, and which facilitate the quantification of the notion of critical mass for research groups. We present these critical masses for many academic areas. A consequence of our analysis is that overall research performance of a given discipline is improved by supporting medium-sized groups over large ones, while small groups must strive to achieve critical mass.
arXiv comment16 pages, 6 figures consisting of 16 panels. Presentation and reference list improved for version 2
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Group size effect on cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas II. Curvilinear effect
- Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence
- Narrative structure of A Song of Ice and Fire creates a fictional world with realistic measures of social complexity
- Absolute and specific measures of research group excellence
- Effects of Publications in Proceedings on the Measure of the Core Size of Coauthors
- Academic research groups: evaluation of their quality and quality of their evaluation
- Binary Scientific Star Coauthors Core Size
- Two cultures: "them and us'' in the academic world
- Statistics of statisticians: Critical mass of statistics and operational research groups in the UK