Scientific Workflow Applications on Amazon EC2
arXiv:1005.2718 · doi:10.1109/ESCIW.2009.5408002
Abstract
The proliferation of commercial cloud computing providers has generated significant interest in the scientific computing community. Much recent research has attempted to determine the benefits and drawbacks of cloud computing for scientific applications. Although clouds have many attractive features, such as virtualization, on-demand provisioning, and "pay as you go" usage-based pricing, it is not clear whether they are able to deliver the performance required for scientific applications at a reasonable price. In this paper we examine the performance and cost of clouds from the perspective of scientific workflow applications. We use three characteristic workflows to compare the performance of a commercial cloud with that of a typical HPC system, and we analyze the various costs associated with running those workflows in the cloud. We find that the performance of clouds is not unreasonable given the hardware resources provided, and that performance comparable to HPC systems can be achieved given similar resources. We also find that the cost of running workflows on a commercial cloud can be reduced by storing data in the cloud rather than transferring it from outside.
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (8)
- On a Catalogue of Metrics for Evaluating Commercial Cloud Services
- On Evaluating Commercial Cloud Services: A Systematic Review
- The Application of Cloud Computing to the Creation of Image Mosaics and Management of Their Provenance
- A Factor Framework for Experimental Design for Performance Evaluation of Commercial Cloud Services
- Cloud Infrastructure Provenance Collection and Management to Reproduce Scientific Workflow Execution
- FisHook -- An Optimized Approach to Marine Specie Classification using MobileNetV2
- Performance Measurements of Supercomputing and Cloud Storage Solutions
- Evaluating virtual hosted desktops for graphics-intensive astronomy