Countering Trusting Trust through Diverse Double-Compiling
arXiv:1004.5548 · doi:10.1109/CSAC.2005.17
Abstract
An Air Force evaluation of Multics, and Ken Thompson's famous Turing award lecture "Reflections on Trusting Trust," showed that compilers can be subverted to insert malicious Trojan horses into critical software, including themselves. If this attack goes undetected, even complete analysis of a system's source code will not find the malicious code that is running, and methods for detecting this particular attack are not widely known. This paper describes a practical technique, termed diverse double-compiling (DDC), that detects this attack and some compiler defects as well. Simply recompile the source code twice: once with a second (trusted) compiler, and again using the result of the first compilation. If the result is bit-for-bit identical with the untrusted binary, then the source code accurately represents the binary. This technique has been mentioned informally, but its issues and ramifications have not been identified or discussed in a peer-reviewed work, nor has a public demonstration been made. This paper describes the technique, justifies it, describes how to overcome practical challenges, and demonstrates it.
13 pages.
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Killing Two Birds with One Stone: Malicious Package Detection in NPM and PyPI using a Single Model of Malicious Behavior Sequence
- Software-Based Fault Recovery via Adaptive Diversity for COTS Multi-Core Processors
- Attestable Builds: Compiling Verifiable Binaries on Untrusted Systems using Trusted Execution Environments
- Automated Verification Of Role-Based Access Control Policies Constraints Using Prover9
- Software Supply Chain Security of Web3