The ergodicity bias in the observed galaxy distribution
arXiv:1003.5722 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/08/019
Abstract
The spatial distribution of galaxies we observed is subject to the given condition that we, human beings are sitting right in a galaxy -- the Milky Way. Thus the ergodicity assumption is questionable in interpretation of the observed galaxy distribution. The resultant difference between observed statistics (volume average) and the true cosmic value (ensemble average) is termed as the ergodicity bias. We perform explicit numerical investigation of the effect for a set of galaxy survey depths and near-end distance cuts. It is found that the ergodicity bias in observed two- and three-point correlation functions in most cases is insignificant for modern analysis of samples from galaxy surveys and thus close a loophole in precision cosmology. However, it may become non-negligible in certain circumstances, such as those applications involving three-point correlation function at large scales of local galaxy samples. Thus one is reminded to take extra care in galaxy sample construction and interpretation of the statistics of the sample, especially when the characteristic redshift is low.
Revised version published as JCAP08(2010)019
References in corpus (6)
- Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 Galaxy Sample
- The imprints of primordial non-gaussianities on large-scale structure: scale dependent bias and abundance of virialized objects
- Measuring primordial non-gaussianity without cosmic variance
- A Halo Model of Galaxy Colors and Clustering in the SDSS
- Primordial non-Gaussianity, scale-dependent bias, and the bispectrum of galaxies
- SDSS Galaxy Clustering: Luminosity & Colour Dependence and Stochasticity