Empirical Equivalence, Artificial Gauge Freedom and a Generalized Kretschmann Objection
arXiv:0911.5400
Abstract
Einstein considered general covariance to characterize the novelty of his General Theory of Relativity (GTR), but Kretschmann thought it merely a formal feature that any theory could have. The claim that GTR is "already parametrized" suggests analyzing substantive general covariance as formal general covariance achieved without hiding preferred coordinates as scalar "clock fields," much as Einstein construed general covariance as the lack of preferred coordinates. Physicists often install gauge symmetries artificially with additional fields, as in the transition from Proca's to Stueckelberg's electromagnetism. Some post-positivist philosophers, due to realist sympathies, are committed to judging Stueckelberg's electromagnetism distinct from and inferior to Proca's. By contrast, physicists identify them, the differences being gauge-dependent and hence unreal. It is often useful to install gauge freedom in theories with broken gauge symmetries (second-class constraints) using a modified Batalin-Fradkin-Tyutin (BFT) procedure. Massive GTR, for which parametrization and a Lagrangian BFT-like procedure appear to coincide, mimics GTR's general covariance apart from telltale clock fields. A generalized procedure for installing artificial gauge freedom subsumes parametrization and BFT, while being more Lagrangian-friendly than BFT, leaving any primary constraints unchanged and using a non-BFT boundary condition. Artificial gauge freedom licenses a generalized Kretschmann objection. However, features of paradigm cases of artificial gauge freedom might help to demonstrate a principled distinction between substantive and merely formal gauge symmetry.
54 pages
References in corpus (9)
- Photon and Graviton Mass Limits
- No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model
- Some remarks on the notions of general covariance and background independence
- Gauge invariant Lagrangian formulation of higher spin massive bosonic field theory in AdS space
- On massive spin 2 interactions
- Revisiting observables in generally covariant theories in the light of gauge fixing methods
- Diffeomorphism Invariance in the Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity
- Permanent Underdetermination from Approximate Empirical Equivalence in Field Theory: Massless and Massive Scalar Gravity, Neutrino, Electromagnetic, Yang-Mills and Gravitational Theories
- Nonlinear Perturbations and Conservation Laws on Curved Backgrounds in GR and Other Metric Theories
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Artificial vs Substantial Gauge Symmetries: a Criterion and an Application to the Electroweak Model
- Permanent Underdetermination from Approximate Empirical Equivalence in Field Theory: Massless and Massive Scalar Gravity, Neutrino, Electromagnetic, Yang-Mills and Gravitational Theories
- Bundle geometry of the connection space, covariant Hamiltonian formalism, the problem of boundaries in gauge theories, and the dressing field method
- Note on the bundle geometry of field space, variational connections, the dressing field method, & presymplectic structures of gauge theories over bounded regions
- The dressing field method for diffeomorphisms: a relational framework
- The Field-Theoretic Approach in General Relativity and Other Metric Theories. A Review