paper

High energy emission components in the short GRB 090510

arXiv:0911.4453 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1008

Abstract

We investigate the origin of the prompt and delayed emission observed in the short GRB 090510. We use the broad-band data to test whether the most popular theoretical models for gamma-ray burst emission can accommodate the observations for this burst. We first attempt to explain the soft-to-hard spectral evolution associated with the delayed onset of a GeV tail with the hypothesis that the prompt burst and the high energy tail both originate from a single process, namely synchrotron emission from internal shocks. Considerations on the compactness of the source imply that the high-energy tail should be produced in a late-emitted shell, characterized by a Lorentz factor greater than the one generating the prompt burst. However, in this hypothesis, the predicted evolution of the synchrotron peak frequency does not agree with the observed soft-to-hard evolution. Given the difficulties of a single-mechanism hypothesis, we test two alternative double-component scenarios. In the first, the prompt burst is explained as synchrotron radiation from internal shocks, and the high energy emission (up to about 1 s following the trigger) as internal shock synchrotron-self-Compton. In the second scenario, in view of its long duration (\sim 100 s), the high energy tail is decoupled from the prompt burst and has an external shock origin. In this case, we show that a reasonable choice of parameters does indeed exist to accommodate the optical-to-GeV data, provided the Lorentz factor of the shocked shell is sufficiently high. Finally, we attempt to explain the chromatic break observed around \sim 1e3 s with a structured jet model. We find that this might be a viable explanation, and that it lowers the high value of the burst energy derived assuming isotropy, \sim 1e53 erg, below \sim 1e49 erg, more compatible with the energetics from a binary merger progenitor.

19 pages, 3 color figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. New version addresses Referee's comments

References in corpus (8)

Cited by in corpus (55)