Is cosmology just a plausibility argument?
arXiv:0910.3374
Abstract
I review the basis and limitations of plausible inference in cosmology, in particular the limitation that it can only provide fundamentally true inferences when the hypotheses under consideration form a set that is exhaustive. They never do; this recommends abandoning realism. Despite this, we can adopt a scientifically correct pragmatism and understand aspects of the cosmological model with enormous confidence. I illustrate these points with discussion of one certainty--expansion--and two current controversies--the existence of large extra dimensions and the possibility that the matter distribution forms a fractal on large scales. I argue that the existence of large extra dimensions is certainly plausible, but a fractal universe is untenable.
A contribution to the meeting "Exploring the High Energy Universe" in honor of Roger Blandford. Published on the arXiv only
References in corpus (11)
- Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
- Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP
- Cosmology on a Brane in Minkowski Bulk
- A Parameterized Post-Friedmann Framework for Modified Gravity
- Using SN Ia Light Curve Shapes to Measure The Hubble Constant
- Cosmic homogeneity demonstrated with luminous red galaxies
- First-Year Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II (SDSS-II) Supernova Results: Constraints on Non-Standard Cosmological Models
- Challenges to the DGP Model from Horizon-Scale Growth and Geometry
- A Tolman Surface Brightness Test for Universal Expansion, and the Evolution of Elliptical Galaxies in Distant Clusters
- Cosmic transparency: A test with the baryon acoustic feature and type Ia supernovae
- Large-Scale Structure in Brane-Induced Gravity I. Perturbation Theory