Second comment to "Invariance of the tunneling method"
arXiv:0909.3800
Abstract
I reply to the four points raised by S. A. Hayward, R. Di Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini (arXiv:0909.2956v1) against my comment (arXiv:0907.2020v1) to their previous article. I maintain my position on the wrongness of their paper, reporting also another mistake.
4 pages
References in corpus (4)
- On the existence of black hole evaporation yet again
- Reply to Comments on "Invariance of the tunneling method for dynamical black holes" arXiv:0907.2020
- The time factor in the semi-classical approach to the Hawking radiation
- Comment on the ``Invariance of the Tunneling Method for Dynamical Black Holes''