Telescope Time Without Tears: A Distributed Approach to Peer Review
arXiv:0906.1943 · doi:10.1111/j.1468-4004.2009.50416.x
Abstract
The procedure that is currently employed to allocate time on telescopes is horribly onerous on those unfortunate astronomers who serve on the committees that administer the process, and is in danger of complete collapse as the number of applications steadily increases. Here, an alternative is presented, whereby the task is distributed around the astronomical community, with a suitable mechanism design established to steer the outcome toward awarding this precious resource to those projects where there is a consensus across the community that the science is most exciting and innovative.
9 pages, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Geophysics
Cited by in corpus (11)
- CrowdGrader: Crowdsourcing the Evaluation of Homework Assignments
- Distributed peer review enhanced with natural language processing and machine learning
- Incentives, Quality, and Risks: A Look Into the NSF Proposal Review Pilot
- On Strategyproof Conference Peer Review
- TrueReview: A Platform for Post-Publication Peer Review
- Evaluating Complex Task through Crowdsourcing: Multiple Views Approach
- Analysis of the ALMA Cycle 8 Distributed Peer Review Process
- Update on the Systematics in the ALMA Proposal Review Process after Cycle 8
- Simulation Study on a New Peer Review Approach
- Optimal Impartial Selection
- Peer Selection with Noisy Assessments