Deviation from the Cosmological Constant or Systematic Errors?

Abstract

Motivated by the fact that both SNe Ia and GRBs seem to prefer a dark energy EOS greater than -1 at redshifts $z\gtrsim 0.5$, we perform a careful investigation on this situation. We find that the deviation of dark energy from the cosmological constant at redshifts $z\gtrsim 0.5$ is large enough that we should pay close attention to it with future observational data. Such a deviation may arise from some biasing systematic errors in the handling of SNe Ia and/or GRBs or more interestingly from the nature of the dark energy itself.

4 pages, 4 figures, added references

References in corpus (10)

• New Hubble Space Telescope Discoveries of Type Ia Supernovae at z > 1: Narrowing Constraints on the Early Behavior of Dark Energy
• Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets
• Improved Dark Energy Constraints from ~100 New CfA Supernova Type Ia Light Curves
• Measuring the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation scale using the SDSS and 2dFGRS
• Two new diagnostics of dark energy
• CfA3: 185 Type Ia Supernova Light Curves from the CfA
• The Hubble Diagram to Redshift >6 from 69 Gamma-Ray Bursts
• Model-Independent Distance Measurements from Gamma-Ray Bursts and Constraints on Dark Energy
• Narrowing Constraints with Type Ia Supernovae: Converging on a Cosmological Constant
• Constraining the evolution of dark energy with type Ia supernovae and gamma-ray bursts