How semiregular are irregular variables?
arXiv:0902.4096 · doi:10.1002/asna.200811194
Abstract
We investigate the question whether there is a real difference in the light change between stars classified as semiregular (SRV) or irregular (Lb) variables by analysing photometric light curves of 12 representatives of each class. Using Fourier analysis we try to find a periodic signal in each light curve and determine the S/N of this signal. For all stars, independent of their variability class we detect a period above the significance threshold. No difference in the measured S/N between the two classes could be found. We propose that the Lb stars can be seen as an extension of the SRVs towards shorter periods and smaller amplitudes. This is in agreement with findings from other quantities which also showed no marked difference between the two classes.
7 pages, accepted for publication by AN
References in corpus (9)
- Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction
- New Periodic Variables from the Hipparcos Epoch Photometry
- SigSpec - I. Frequency- and Phase-Resolved Significance in Fourier Space
- Mass loss rates of a sample of irregular and semiregular M-type AGB-variables
- Variable Stars in the Magellanic Clouds: Results from OGLE and SIRIUS
- A heuristic derivation of the uncertainty of the frequency determination in time series data
- Long period variables in 47 Tuc: direct evidence for lost mass
- Evidence for Low-Dimensional Chaos in Semiregular Variable Stars
- Period-Luminosity-Colour distribution and classification of Galactic oxygen-rich LPVs
Cited by in corpus (6)
- A comparison of period finding algorithms
- Semiregular variables with periods lying between the period-luminosity sequences C', C and D
- Interplay between pulsation, mass loss, and third dredge-up: More about Miras with and without technetium
- Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Ratios. II. Semiregular Variable M Giants
- Circumstellar HI and CO around the carbon stars V1942 Sgr and V CrB
- Kepler and the Long Period Variables