Like vs. Like: Strategy and Improvements in Supernova Cosmology Systematics

Abstract

Control of systematic uncertainties in the use of Type Ia supernovae as standardized distance indicators can be achieved through contrasting subsets of observationally-characterized, like supernovae. Essentially, like supernovae at different redshifts reveal the cosmology, and differing supernovae at the same redshift reveal systematics, including evolution not already corrected for by the standardization. Here we examine the strategy for use of empirically defined subsets to minimize the cosmological parameter risk, the quadratic sum of the parameter uncertainty and systematic bias. We investigate the optimal recognition of subsets within the sample and discuss some issues of observational requirements on accurately measuring subset properties. Neglecting like vs. like comparison (i.e. creating only a single Hubble diagram) can cause cosmological constraints on dark energy to be biased by 1σor degraded by a factor 1.6 for a total drift of 0.02 mag. Recognition of subsets at the 0.016 mag level (relative differences) erases bias and reduces the degradation to 2%.

11 pages, 6 figures

References in corpus (23)

• Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
• Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
• Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z>1 From the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution
• The Supernova Legacy Survey: Measurement of Omega_M, Omega_Lambda and w from the First Year Data Set
• New Hubble Space Telescope Discoveries of Type Ia Supernovae at z > 1: Narrowing Constraints on the Early Behavior of Dark Energy
• Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets
• New Constraints on ${\Omega }_M$, ${\Omega }_{\Lambda }$, and w from an Independent Set of Eleven High-Redshift Supernovae Observed with HST
• Observational Constraints on the Nature of the Dark Energy: First Cosmological Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey
• Scrutinizing Exotic Cosmological Models Using ESSENCE Supernova Data Combined with Other Cosmological Probes
• Rates and properties of type Ia supernovae as a function of mass and star-formation in their host galaxies
• The diversity of Type Ia Supernovae: evidence for systematics?
• Evidence for a Spectroscopic Sequence Among SNe Ia
• Comparative Direct Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Spectra. II. Maximum Light
• Optical Spectroscopy of Type Ia Supernovae
• Mapping the Cosmological Expansion
• Verifying the Cosmological Utility of Type Ia Supernovae: Implications of a Dispersion in the Ultraviolet Spectra
• Using Line Profiles to Test the Fraternity of Type Ia Supernovae at High and Low Redshifts
• Predicted and observed evolution in the mean properties of Type Ia supernovae with redshift
• SNLS Spectroscopy: Testing for Evolution in Type Ia Supernovae
• On the Spectroscopic Diversity of Type Ia Supernovae
• Constraining Cosmic Evolution of Type Ia Supernovae
• Quantitative comparison between Type Ia supernova spectra at low and high redshifts: A case study
• Type Ia supernova diversity: Standardizing the candles

Cited by in corpus (9)

• Precise Throughput Determination of the PanSTARRS Telescope and the Gigapixel Imager using a Calibrated Silicon Photodiode and a Tunable Laser: Initial Results
• Cosmological parameter extraction and biases from type Ia supernova magnitude evolution
• The Crossing Statistic: Dealing with Unknown Errors in the Dispersion of Type Ia Supernovae
• Searching for systematics in SNIa and galaxy cluster data using the cosmic duality relation
• Photometric Supernovae Redshift Systematics Requirements
• Generating and Analyzing Constrained Dark Energy Equations of State and Systematics Functions
• Reducing Zero-point Systematics in Dark Energy Supernova Experiments
• Correlated Supernova Systematics and Ground Based Surveys
• Tailoring Strong Lensing Cosmographic Observations