Proof of the the Riemann hypothesis from the density and Lindelof hypotheses via a power sum method

Abstract

The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the $\varpi$-form of the prime number theorem as $\varpi(x) =O(x\sp{1/2} \log\sp{2} x)$, where $\varpi(x) =\sum\sb{n\le x}\ \bigl(Λ(n) -1\big)$ with the sum running through the set of all natural integers. Let ${\mathsf Z}(s) = -\tfrac{ζ\sp{\prime}(s)}{ζ(s)} -ζ(s)$. We use the classical integral formula for the Heaviside function in the form of ${\mathsf H}(x) =\int\sb{m -i\infty} \sp{m +i\infty} \tfrac{x\sp{s}}{s} \dd s$ where $m>0$, and $\mathsf{H}(x)$ is 0 when $\frac{1}{2}<x<1$, $\frac{1}{2}$ when $x=1$, and 1 when $x>1$. However, we diverge from the literature by applying Cauchy's residue theorem to the function ${\mathsf Z}(s) \cdot \tfrac{x\sp{s}} {s}$, rather than $-\tfrac{ζ\sp{\prime}(s)} {ζ(s)} \cdot \tfrac{x\sp{s}}{s}$, so that we may utilize the formula for $\frac{1}{2}<m<1$, under certain conditions. Starting with the estimate on $\varpi (x)$ from the trivial zero-free region $\sigma >1$ of $\mathsf{Z}(s)$, we use induction to reduce the size of the exponent $\theta$ in $\varpi(x) =O(x\spθ \log\sp{2} x)$, while we also use induction on $x$ when $\theta$ is fixed. We prove that the Riemann hypothesis is valid under the assumptions of the explicit strong density hypothesis and the Lindelöf hypothesis recently proven, via a result of the implication on the zero free regions from the remainder terms of the prime number theorem by the power sum method of Turán.

This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators due to disputed authorship

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Proof of the strong Density Hypothesis
• Preventing Exceptions to Robins InEquality
• Further Estimates with Pseudogamma functions
• Analytic implication from the prime number theorem
• Proof of the strong Linderlof hypothesis