Towards a three dimensional solution for 3N bound states with 3NFs
arXiv:0810.1161 · doi:10.1142/S0217732309000073
Abstract
After a brief discussion about the necessity of using the 3D approach, we present the non PW formalism for 3N bound state with the inclusion of 3N force (3NF). As an example the evaluation of 3NF matrix elements, which appear in the obtained coupled three dimensional integral equations, for -exchange Tucson-Melbourne 3NF show how would be this formalism efficient and less cumbersome in comparison with the PW formalism.
8 pages, this paper is based on an invited talk given at the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics 2008, Depok, Indonesia, August 19 - 23, 2008
References in corpus (13)
- Three-Body Scattering at Intermediate Energies
- Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering in a Three Dimensional Approach
- Four-Body Bound State Calculations in Three-Dimensional Approach
- Three-Nucleon Bound State in a Spin-Isospin Dependent Three Dimensional Approach
- First Order Relativistic Three-Body Scattering
- New Forms of Deuteron Equations and Wave Function Representations
- The Nd Break-Up Process in Leading Order in a Three-Dimensional Approach
- Model Study of Three-Body Forces in the Three-Body Bound State
- A Realistic Formalism for 4N Bound State in a Three-Dimensional Yakubovsky Scheme
- The Operator form of 3H (3He) and its Spin Structure
- Bound State Calculations of the Three-Dimensional Yakubovsky Equations with the inclusion of Three-Body Forces
- Faddeev and Glauber Calculations at Intermediate Energies in a Model for n+d Scattering
- Low-momentum effective interaction in the three-dimensional approach
Cited by in corpus (3)
- Solutions of the bound state Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations in three dimensions by using NN and 3N potential models
- Four-body bound states in momentum space: the Yakubovsky approach without two-body matrices
- Comment on "Three-dimensional study of the six-body bound-state for the case of effective three-body configuration model" [Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 9 (2016) 1650072]