The role of optimization in the human dynamics of tasks execution

Abstract

In order to explain the empirical evidence that the dynamics of human activity may not be well modeled by Poisson processes, a model based on queuing processes were built in the literature \cite{bar05}. The main assumption behind that model is that people execute their tasks based on a protocol that execute firstly the high priority item. In this context, the purpose of this letter is to analyze the validity of that hypothesis assuming that people are rational agents that make their decisions in order minimize the cost of keeping non-executed tasks on the list. Therefore, we build and solve analytically a dynamic programming model with two priority types of tasks and show that the validity of this hypothesis depends strongly on the structure of the instantaneous costs that a person has to face if a given task is kept on the list for more than one step. Moreover, one interesting finding is that in one of the situations the protocol used to execute the tasks generates complex one dimensional dynamics.

References in corpus (6)

• The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics
• A continuous time random walk model for financial distributions
• Exact results for the Barabasi model of human dynamics
• Waiting times between orders and trades in double-auction markets
• Human activity modeling and Barabasi's queueing systems
• The agents' preferences and the topology of networks

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Bursty Human Dynamics
• Controlling self-organized criticality in sandpile models
• Exact results for the Barabasi queuing model
• A dynamical programming approach for controlling the directed abelian Dhar-Ramaswamy model
• Individual and Group Dynamics in Purchasing Activity
• Numerical study on the deadline-concerning priority queuing model