Reply to "the Comment on `Gauge Invariance and kT-Factorization of Exclusive Processes'"

Abstract

A new method is proposed to calculate wave functions in $k_T$-factorization in \cite{LiMi} as a comment about our paper \cite{FMW}. We point out that the results obtained with the method are in conflict with the translation invariance and depend on the chosen contours for loop-integrals. Therefore, the method is in principle unacceptable and the results with the method cannot be correct.

Add one equation and discussion, version to appear in Phys. Lett. B

References in corpus (3)

• Next-to-leading-order corrections to exclusive processes in $k_T$ factorization
• Gauge Invariance and k_T-Factorization of Exclusive Processes
• Comment on "Gauge Invariance and $k_T$-Factorization of Exclusive Processes"

Cited by in corpus (12)

• Pion transition form factor in k_T factorization
• Gauge Invariance and k_T-Factorization of Exclusive Processes
• A bird's-eye view of nonlinear-optical processes: unification through scale invariance
• A Momentous Arrow of Time
• Study of ${\bar{B}}^0\to D^0{\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}$ Decay in Perturbative QCD Approach
• Reply to "Comment on 'Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics' by Joshua B. Halpern, Christopher M. Colose, Chris Ho-Stuart, Joel D. Shore, Arthur P. Smith, Jörg Zimmermann"
• Comment on "Nonlocality claims are inconsistent with Hilbert-space quantum mechanics"
• Spurious causality hiding an action at a distance
• Charmless $B_{u,d,s}\to VT$ decays in perturbative QCD approach
• Resummation of Large Logarithms in the Electromagnetic Form factor of pion
• A Note on the $k_T$-Factorization for Exclusive Processes
• Angular momentum nonconservation and conservation in quasiclassical Positronium