Local Causality and Completeness: Bell vs. Jarrett

Abstract

J.S. Bell believed that his famous theorem entailed a deep and troubling conflict between the empirically verified predictions of quantum theory and the notion of local causality that is motivated by relativity theory. Yet many physicists continue to accept, usually on the reports of textbook writers and other commentators, that Bell's own view was wrong, and that, in fact, the theorem only brings out a conflict with determinism or the hidden-variables program or realism or some other such principle that (unlike local causality), allegedly, nobody should have believed anyway. (Moreover, typically such beliefs arise without the person in question even being aware that the view they are accepting differs so radically from Bell's own.) Here we try to shed some light on the situation by focusing on the concept of local causality that is the heart of Bell's theorem, and, in particular, by contrasting Bell's own understanding with the analysis of Jon Jarrett which has been the most influential source, in recent decades, for the kinds of claims mentioned previously. We point out a crucial difference between Jarrett's and Bell's own understanding of Bell's formulation of local causality, which turns out to be the basis for the erroneous claim, made by Jarrett and many others, that Bell misunderstood the implications of his own theorem.

10 pages, 4 figures

References in corpus (3)

• What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us?
• Einstein's Boxes
• Bell Locality and the Nonlocal Character of Nature

Cited by in corpus (18)

• Bell nonlocality
• Relaxed Bell inequalities and Kochen-Specker theorems
• New Slant on the EPR-Bell Experiment
• Non-separability does not relieve the problem of Bell's theorem
• Bell's theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism
• Quantum causal models, faithfulness and retrocausality
• Randomness? What randomness?
• Contextual inferences, nonlocality, and the incompleteness of quantum mechanics
• Nonlocal quantum information transfer without superluminal signalling and communication
• How to account for quantum non-locality: ontic structural realism and the primitive ontology of quantum physics
• Constraints on determinism: Bell versus Conway-Kochen
• Does quantum nonlocality irremediably conflict with Special Relativity?
• On the concept of Bell's local causality in local classical and quantum theory
• Bell's Theorem, Accountability and Nonlocality
• Classifying Causal Structures: Ascertaining when Classical Correlations are Constrained by Inequalities
• On the meaning of locality: the overlapping assumptions
• Bell vs Bell: a ding-dong battle over quantum incompleteness
• Bell's local causality is a d-separation criterion