Adiabatic approximation, Gell-Mann and Low theorem and degeneracies: A pedagogical example
arXiv:0807.4218 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042102
Abstract
We study a simple system described by a 2x2 Hamiltonian and the evolution of the quantum states under the influence of a perturbation. More precisely, when the initial Hamiltonian is not degenerate,we check analytically the validity of the adiabatic approximation and verify that, even if the evolution operator has no limit for adiabatic switchings, the Gell-Mann and Low formula allows to follow the evolution of eigenstates. In the degenerate case, for generic initial eigenstates, the adiabatic approximation (obtained by two different limiting procedures) is either useless or wrong, and the Gell-Mann and Low formula does not hold. We show how to select initial states in order to avoid such failures.
6 pages, 2 figures
Cited by in corpus (14)
- Schrieffer-Wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems
- Multipoint correlation functions: spectral representation and numerical evaluation
- The many-body Green function of degenerate systems
- Gell-Mann and Low formula for degenerate unperturbed states
- Perturbative diagonalization for time-dependent strong interactions
- Loschmidt-amplitude wave function spectroscopy and the physics of dynamically driven phase transitions
- Controllability of spin-boson systems
- The Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation series of quasi-degenerate systems
- The Adiabatically Deformed Ensemble: Engineering Non-Thermal States of Matter
- Adiabatic theorems for general linear operators with time-independent domains
- Comment on "Generalized James' Effective Hamiltonian Method"
- On some aspects of the definition of scattering states in quantum field theory
- Accuracy of the quantum adiabatic theorem in its original form
- Quantization due to the time evolution, with applications to Quantum Yang-Mills theory, Quantum Gravity and Classical Statistical Field Theory