Constituent gluon interpretation of glueballs and gluelumps
arXiv:0806.3174 · doi:10.1140/epja/i2008-10675-5
Abstract
Arguments are given that support the interpretation of the lattice QCD glueball and gluelump spectra in terms of bound states of massless constituent gluons with helicity-1. In this scheme, the mass hierarchy of the currently known gluelumps and glueballs is mainly due to the number of constituent gluons and can be understood within a simple flux tube model. It is also argued that the lattice QCD glueball should be seen as a four-gluon bound state. The flux tube model allows for a parameter-free computation of its mass, which is in good agreement with lattice QCD.
3 figures, use of package youngtab
References in corpus (9)
- Glueballs, Hybrids, Multiquarks. Experimental facts versus QCD inspired concepts
- Gluons in glueballs: Spin or helicity?
- Baryonic mass formula in large QCD versus quark model
- Baryonium, tetra-quark state and glue-ball in large N_c QCD
- First study of the gluon-quark-antiquark static potential in SU(3) Lattice QCD
- Semirelativistic potential model for three-gluon glueballs
- Semirelativistic potential model for low-lying three-gluon glueballs
- Effective potential between two gluons from the scalar glueball
- Short-range potentials from QCD at order
Cited by in corpus (8)
- An updated review of the new hadron states
- Exotic glueball states in QCD Sum Rules
- Glueball phenomenology and the relativistic flux tube model
- Mass spectrum of pseudo-scalar glueballs from a Bethe-Salpeter approach with the rainbow-ladder truncation
- Glueballs and the Yang-Mills plasma in a -matrix approach
- Semirelativistic Hamiltonians and the auxiliary field method
- Wave functions of pure gauge glueballs on the lattice
- Casimir scaling in glueballs in SU() and Sp() gauge theories: hints from constituent approaches