What can we learn from decays?
arXiv:0806.2510 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074009
Abstract
We investigate the decays under the factorization scheme and find many discrepancies between theoretical predictions and the experimental data. In the tree dominated processes, large contributions from color-suppressed tree diagrams are required in order to accommodate with the large decay rates of and . For decays which are both induced by transition, theoretical predictions on their decay rates are larger than the data by a factor of 2.8 and 5.5, respectively. Large electro-weak penguins or some new mechanism are expected to explain the branching ratios of and . The soft-collinear-effective-theory has the potential to explain large decay rates of and via a large hard-scattering form factor . We will also show that, with proper charming penguins, predictions on the branching ratios of can also be consistent with the data.
16 pages, no figure
References in corpus (9)
- Charmless non-leptonic B_s decays to PP, PV and VV final states in the pQCD approach
- The , , and decays in the perturbative QCD approach
- Hadronic charmless B decays B-> AP
- Charmless Two-body decays In Soft-Collinear-Effective-Theory
- Microscopic and Macroscopic Behaviors of Palatini Modified Gravity Theories
- Implication of the B -> rho rho data on the B -> pi pi puzzle
- Nonleptonic two-body B-decays including axial-vector mesons in the final state
- Branching Ratios and CP Asymmetries of B \to a_1(1260) πand a_1(1260) K Decays
- Analysis of the form-factors with light-cone QCD sum rules