Do subleading corrections to Bekenstein-Hawking entropy hold the key to quantum gravity?
arXiv:0805.4531 · doi:10.1142/S021773230802731X
Abstract
Black-holes are considered to be theoretical laboratories for testing models of quantum gravity. It is usually believed that any candidate for quantum gravity must explain the microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking () entropy. In this letter, we argue (i) the requirement for a candidate approach to go beyond and provide generic subleading corrections, and (ii) the importance to {\it disentangle} and identify the degrees of freedom leading to and its subleading corrections. Using the approach of entanglement of modes across the horizon, we show that the microscopic degrees of freedom that lead to and subleading corrections are different. We further show, using microcanonical and canonical ensemble approaches, that the quantum entanglement predicts generic power-law corrections to and that the corrections can be identified with the kinematical properties of the event-horizon.
6 pages, Final version, To appear in MPLA
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Effective temperature, Hawking radiation and quasinormal modes
- Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation for Black Hole Evaporation: no Information Loss
- Precise model of Hawking radiation from the tunnelling mechanism
- Black hole quantum spectrum
- Effective temperature for black holes
- Quasi-normal modes: the "electrons" of black holes as "gravitational atoms"? Implications for the black hole information puzzle
- Unitarity and the Hilbert space of quantum gravity
- Tunnelling mechanism in non-commutative space with generalized uncertainty principle and Bohr-like black hole
- Initiating the effective unification of black hole horizon area and entropy quantization with quasi-normal modes