Dynamic force spectroscopy: analysis of reversible bond-breaking dynamics
arXiv:0805.1126 · doi:10.1063/1.2968543
Abstract
The problem of diffusive bond-dissociation in a double well potential under application of an external force is scrutinized. We compute the probability distribution of rupture forces and present a detailed discussion of the influence of finite rebinding probabilities on the dynamic force spectrum. In particular, we focus on barrier crossing upon extension, i.e. under linearly increased load, and upon relaxation starting from completely separated bonds. For large loading rates the rupture force and the rejoining force depend on the loading rate in the expected manner determined by the shape of the potential. For small loading rates the mean forces obtained from pull and relax modes approach each other as the system reaches equilibrium. We investigate the dependence of the rupture force distributions and mean rupture forces on external parameters like cantilever stiffness and influence of a soft linker. We find that depending on the implementation of a soft linker the equilibrium rupture force is either unaffected by the presence of the linker or changes in a predictable way with the linker-compliance. Additionally, we show that it is possible to extract the equilibrium constant of the on- and off-rates from the determination of the equilibrium rupture forces.
32 pages, 14 figures
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Scaling of hysteresis loop of interacting polymers under a periodic force
- Dynamic coarse-graining fills the gap between atomistic simulations and experimental investigations of mechanical unfolding
- Force-clamp spectroscopy of reversible bond breakage
- Statistics of reversible transitions in two-state trajectories in force-ramp spectroscopy
- Statistics of reversible bond dynamics observed in force-clamp spectroscopy
- Force probe simulations using an adaptive resolution scheme
- Nonlinear response theory for Markov processes IV: The asymmetric double well potential model revisited