A measure of the impact of future dark energy experiments based on discriminating power among quintessence models
arXiv:0804.0413 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043528
Abstract
We evaluate the ability of future data sets to discriminate among different quintessence dark energy models. This approach gives an alternative measure for assessing the impact of future experiments, as compared with the large body of literature that compares experiments in abstract parameter spaces and more recent work that evaluates the constraining power of experiments on individual parameter spaces of specific quintessence models. We use the Dark Energy Task Force (DETF) models of future data sets, and compare the discriminative power of experiments designated by the DETF as Stages 2, 3, and 4. Our work reveals a minimal increase in discriminating power when comparing Stage 3 to Stage 2, but a very striking increase in discriminating power when going to Stage 4. We also see evidence that even modest improvements over DETF Stage 4 could result in even more dramatic discriminating power among quintessence dark energy models. We develop and demonstrate the technique of using the independently measured modes of the equation of state as a common parameter space in which to compare the different quintessence models, and we argue that this technique is a powerful one. We use the PNGB, Exponential, Albrecht-Skordis, and Inverse Tracker (or Inverse Power Law) quintessence models for this work. One of our main results is that the goal of discriminating among these models sets a concrete measure on the capabilities of future dark energy experiments. Experiments have to be somewhat better than DETF Stage 4 simulated experiments to fully meet this goal.
11 pages,10 figures, 4 labels V2: Figure resolution improved, typos corrected V3: conclusions supplemented, submitted to PRD V4: Technical error corrected (see footnote 26). No change to our main points and conclusions
References in corpus (11)
- Dynamics of dark energy
- New Hubble Space Telescope Discoveries of Type Ia Supernovae at z > 1: Narrowing Constraints on the Early Behavior of Dark Energy
- Using Galaxy Two-point Correlation Functions to Determine the Redshift Distributions of Galaxies Binned by Photometric Redshift
- Dynamical behavior of generic quintessence potentials: constraints on key dark energy observables
- Cosmic tomographies: baryon acoustic oscillations and weak lensing
- Evaluating Dark Energy Probes using Multi-Dimensional Dark Energy Parameters
- Exploring Parameter Constraints on Quintessential Dark Energy: the Pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Boson Model
- Beyond Two Dark Energy Parameters
- Exploring Parameter Constraints on Quintessential Dark Energy: The Exponential Model
- Exploring Parameter Constraints on Quintessential Dark Energy: the Albrecht-Skordis model
- The case for an aggressive program of dark energy probes
Cited by in corpus (12)
- LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
- Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration
- Falsifying Paradigms for Cosmic Acceleration
- Cosmology with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: an Overview
- Distance, Growth Factor, and Dark Energy Constraints from Photometric Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and Weak Lensing Measurements
- Figures of merit for present and future dark energy probes
- Exploring Parameter Constraints on Quintessential Dark Energy: the Inverse Power Law Model
- Consistency Test of Dark Energy Models
- Constraints on dark energy models from radial baryon acoustic scale measurements
- Properties of the exact analytic solution of the growth factor and its applications
- Model-Independent Predictions for Smooth Cosmic Acceleration Scenarios
- Simulation studies of dark energy clustering induced by the formation of dark matter halos