Reconciling Semiclassical and Bohmian Mechanics: I. Stationary states
arXiv:0802.3472 · doi:10.1063/1.1775766
Abstract
The semiclassical method is characterized by finite forces and smooth, well-behaved trajectories, but also by multivalued representational functions that are ill-behaved at turning points. In contrast, quantum trajectory methods--based on Bohmian mechanics (quantum hydrodynamics)--are characterized by infinite forces and erratic trajectories near nodes, but also well-behaved, single-valued representational functions. In this paper, we unify these two approaches into a single method that captures the best features of both, and in addition, satisfies the correspondence principle. Stationary eigenstates in one degree of freedom are the primary focus, but more general applications are also anticipated.
17 pages, 5 figures
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Interference in Bohmian Mechanics with Complex Action
- Flux Continuity and Probability Conservation in Complexified Bohmian Mechanics
- Interplay of causticity and vorticality within the complex quantum Hamilton-Jacobi formalism
- Reconciling Semiclassical and Bohmian Mechanics: IV. Multisurface Dynamics
- Reconciling Semiclassical and Bohmian Mechanics: V. Wavepacket Dynamics
- Reconciling Semiclassical and Bohmian Mechanics: II. Scattering states for discontinuous potentials
- Reconciling Semiclassical and Bohmian Mechanics: III. Scattering states for continuous potentials
- Towards a mathematical Theory of the Madelung Equations
- Time-dependent quantum Monte Carlo and the stochastic quantization
- Interference, reduced action, and trajectories
- Toward Local Madelung Mechanics in Spacetime
- Neutrino Oscillations with Nil Mass
- Are quantum trajectories suitable for semiclassical approximations?