V-fold cross-validation improved: V-fold penalization

Abstract

We study the efficiency of V-fold cross-validation (VFCV) for model selection from the non-asymptotic viewpoint, and suggest an improvement on it, which we call ``V-fold penalization''. Considering a particular (though simple) regression problem, we prove that VFCV with a bounded V is suboptimal for model selection, because it ``overpenalizes'' all the more that V is large. Hence, asymptotic optimality requires V to go to infinity. However, when the signal-to-noise ratio is low, it appears that overpenalizing is necessary, so that the optimal V is not always the larger one, despite of the variability issue. This is confirmed by some simulated data. In order to improve on the prediction performance of VFCV, we define a new model selection procedure, called ``V-fold penalization'' (penVF). It is a V-fold subsampling version of Efron's bootstrap penalties, so that it has the same computational cost as VFCV, while being more flexible. In a heteroscedastic regression framework, assuming the models to have a particular structure, we prove that penVF satisfies a non-asymptotic oracle inequality with a leading constant that tends to 1 when the sample size goes to infinity. In particular, this implies adaptivity to the smoothness of the regression function, even with a highly heteroscedastic noise. Moreover, it is easy to overpenalize with penVF, independently from the V parameter. A simulation study shows that this results in a significant improvement on VFCV in non-asymptotic situations.

40 pages, plus a separate technical appendix

References in corpus (2)

• Consistency of cross validation for comparing regression procedures
• Moment inequalities for U-statistics

Cited by in corpus (12)

• Data-driven calibration of penalties for least-squares regression
• Model selection by resampling penalization
• Choice of V for V-Fold Cross-Validation in Least-Squares Density Estimation
• Analysis of purely random forests bias
• Risk bounds for purely uniformly random forests
• Choosing a penalty for model selection in heteroscedastic regression
• Optimal model selection for density estimation of stationary data under various mixing conditions
• The Slope Heuristics in Heteroscedastic Regression
• A concentration inequality for the excess risk in least-squares regression with random design and heteroscedastic noise
• Comments on: "A Random Forest Guided Tour" by G. Biau and E. Scornet
• On the use of cross-validation for the calibration of the adaptive lasso
• An Empirical Comparison of V-fold Penalisation and Cross Validation for Model Selection in Distribution-Free Regression