Validation in Fusion Research: Towards Guidelines and Best Practices

Abstract

Because experiment/model comparisons in magnetic confinement fusion have not yet satisfied the requirements for validation as understood broadly, a set of approaches to validating mathematical models and numerical algorithms are recommended as good practices. Previously identified procedures, such as verification, qualification, and analysis of error and uncertainty, remain important. However, particular challenges intrinsic to fusion plasmas and physical measurement therein lead to identification of new or less familiar concepts that are also critical in validation. These include the primacy hierarchy, which tracks the integration of measurable quantities, and sensitivity analysis, which assesses how model output is apportioned to different sources of variation. The use of validation metrics for individual measurements is extended to multiple measurements, with provisions for the primacy hierarchy and sensitivity. This composite validation metric is essential for quantitatively evaluating comparisons with experiments. To mount successful and credible validation in magnetic fusion, a new culture of validation is envisaged.

27 pages, 1 table, 6 figures

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Validation of edge turbulence codes against the TCV-X21 diverted L-mode reference case
• Comparison between measured and predicted turbulence frequency spectra in ITG and TEM regimes
• Analysis of plasma instabilities and verification of the BOUT code for the Large Plasma Device
• Modeling of plasma turbulence and transport in the Large Plasma Device
• Study of ITG modes in RFX-mod using TRB code
• MHD modeling of a DIII-D low-torque QH-mode discharge and comparison to observations
• Interpreting Radial Correlation Doppler Reflectometry using Gyrokinetic Simulations
• Numerical turbulence simulations of intermittent fluctuations in the scrape-off layer of magnetized plasmas