A Comparison of natural (english) and artificial (esperanto) languages. A Multifractal method based analysis
arXiv:0801.2510
Abstract
We present a comparison of two english texts, written by Lewis Carroll, one (Alice in wonderland) and the other (Through a looking glass), the former translated into esperanto, in order to observe whether natural and artificial languages significantly differ from each other. We construct one dimensional time series like signals using either word lengths or word frequencies. We use the multifractal ideas for sorting out correlations in the writings. In order to check the robustness of the methods we also write the corresponding shuffled texts. We compare characteristic functions and e.g. observe marked differences in the (far from parabolic) f(alpha) curves, differences which we attribute to Tsallis non extensive statistical features in the ''frequency time series'' and ''length time series''. The esperanto text has more extreme vallues. A very rough approximation consists in modeling the texts as a random Cantor set if resulting from a binomial cascade of long and short words (or words and blanks). This leads to parameters characterizing the text style, and most likely in fine the author writings.
arXiv comment7 pages, 4 double figures, 45 references
References in corpus (11)
- Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series
- Wavelet versus Detrended Fluctuation Analysis of multifractal structures
- Wikipedias: Collaborative web-based encyclopedias as complex networks
- Network properties of written human language
- A Multifractal Description of Wind Speed Records
- Automatic Filters for the Detection of Coherent Structure in Spatiotemporal Systems
- Multifractality in Time Series
- Multifractal analysis of DNA walks and trails
- Language Time Series Analysis
- Error threshold in optimal coding, numerical criteria and classes of universalities for complexity
- Tsallis nonextensive statistical mechanics of El Nino Southern Oscillation Index