Photometric Redshifts and Photometry Errors

Abstract

We examine the impact of non-Gaussian photometry errors on photometric redshift performance. We find that they greatly increase the scatter, but this can be mitigated to some extent by incorporating the correct noise model into the photometric redshift estimation process. However, the remaining scatter is still equivalent to that of a much shallower survey with Gaussian photometry errors. We also estimate the impact of non-Gaussian errors on the spectroscopic sample size required to verify the photometric redshift rms scatter to a given precision. Even with Gaussian {\it photometry} errors, photometric redshift errors are sufficiently non-Gaussian to require an order of magnitude larger sample than simple Gaussian statistics would indicate. The requirements increase from this baseline if non-Gaussian photometry errors are included. Again the impact can be mitigated by incorporating the correct noise model, but only to the equivalent of a survey with much larger Gaussian photometry errors. However, these requirements may well be overestimates because they are based on a need to know the rms, which is particularly sensitive to tails. Other parametrizations of the distribution may require smaller samples.

submitted to ApJL

References in corpus (12)

• Bayesian photometric redshift estimation
• Systematic Errors in Future Weak Lensing Surveys: Requirements and Prospects for Self-Calibration
• A new catalog of photometric redshifts in the Hubble Deep Field
• Slicing Through Multicolor Space: Galaxy Redshifts From Broadband Photometry
• Effect of Photometric Redshift Uncertainties on Weak Lensing Tomography
• Faint Galaxies in deep ACS observations
• Precision photometric redshift calibration for galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
• A blind test of photometric redshift prediction
• The Deep Lens Survey
• Sloan Digital Sky Survey Spectroscopic Lens Search. I. Discovery of Intermediate-Redshift Star-Forming Galaxies Behind Foreground Luminous Red Galaxies
• On the compared accuracy and reliability of spectroscopic and photometric redshift measurements
• The galaxy luminosity - size relation and selection biases in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Overconfidence in Photometric Redshift Estimation
• What Lies Beneath: Using p(z) to Reduce Systematic Photometric Redshift Errors
• Size of spectroscopic calibration samples for cosmic shear photometric redshifts
• Improved Photometric Redshifts via Enhanced Estimates of System Response, Galaxy Templates, and Magnitude Priors
• Catastrophic Photo-z Errors and the Dark Energy Parameter Estimates with Cosmic Shear
• Photometric redshifts with machine learning, lights and shadows on a complex data science use case
• Photometric Redshifts with Surface Brightness Priors