Are the nearby groups of galaxies gravitationally bound objects?
arXiv:0709.3176 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12498.x
Abstract
We have compared numerical simulations to observations for the nearby (< 40 Mpc) groups of galaxies (Huchra & Geller 1982 and Ramella et al. 2002). The group identification is carried out using a group-finding algorithm developed by Huchra and Geller (1982). Using cosmological N-body simulation code with the LambdaCDM cosmology, we show that the dynamical properties of groups of galaxies identified from the simulation data are, in general, in a moderate, within 2sigma, agreement with the observational catalogues of groups of galaxies. As simulations offer more dynamical information than observations, we used the N-body simulation data to calculate whether the nearby groups of galaxies are gravitationally bound objects by using their virial ratio. We show that in a LambdaCDM cosmology about 20 per cent of nearby groups of galaxies, identified by the same algorithm as in the case of observations, are not bound, but merely groups in a visual sense. This is quite significant, specifically because estimations of group masses in observations are often based on an assumption that groups of galaxies found by the friends-of-friends algorithm are gravitationally bound objects. Simulations with different resolutions show the same results. We also show how the fraction of gravitationally unbound groups varies when the apparent magnitude limit of the sample and the value of the cosmological constant is changed. In general, a larger value of the Omega_Lambda generates slightly more unbound groups.
arXiv comment13 figures and 7 tables, Accepted 2007 September 19. Received 2007 September 19; in original form 2007 April 2
References in corpus (24)
- Linking halo mass to galaxy luminosity
- The evolution substructure I: a new identification method
- Galaxy groups in the 2dFGRS: the group-finding algorithm and the 2PIGG catalogue
- Percolation Galaxy Groups and Clusters in the SDSS Redshift Survey: Identification, Catalogs, and the Multiplicity Function
- MLAPM - a C code for cosmological simulations
- Constrained Simulations of the Real Universe: the Local Supercluster
- Clustering of Galaxies in a Hierarchical Universe: III. Mock Redshift Surveys
- The UZC-SSRS2 Group Catalog
- Nearby Optical Galaxies: Selection of the Sample and Identification of Groups
- Galaxy groups in the 2dF redshift survey: The catalogue
- The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue: The luminosity functions of bulges and discs and their implied stellar mass densities
- Galaxy Groups at Intermediate Redshift
- What is L*?: Anatomy of the Galaxy Luminosity Function
- Loose Groups of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey
- The image separation distribution of strong lenses: Halo versus subhalo populations
- The signature of dark energy on the local Hubble flow
- The quiescent Hubble flow, local dark energy tests, and pairwise velocity dispersion in a universe
- Mass Determination of Groups of Galaxies: Effects of the Cosmological Constant
- Testing the Accuracy of Redshift Space Group Finding Algorithms
- Morphological & Dynamical Properties of low redshift 2dFGRS Groups
- Assessing the Accuracy of Masses and Spatial Correlations of Galaxy Groups
- Discordant Redshifts in Compact Groups
- Clusters and Groups of Galaxies in the Simulated Local Universe
- N-Body Simulations of Small Galaxy Groups
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Groups and clusters of galaxies in the SDSS DR8. Value-added catalogues
- The Sloan Great Wall. Morphology and galaxy content
- Multimodality in galaxy clusters from SDSS DR8: substructure and velocity distribution
- Dynamics of Nearby Groups of Galaxies: the role of the cosmological constant
- SPIDER IX - Classifying Galaxy Groups according to their Velocity Distribution
- The Sloan Great Wall. Rich clusters
- Compact groups in theory and practice -- IV. The connection to large-scale structure
- Groups in the Millennium Simulation and in SDSS DR7
- The anatomy of the NGC 5044 group - I. Group membership and dynamics
- The origin of redshift asymmetries: How LambdaCDM explains anomalous redshift
- Improved Lemaitre-Tolman model and the mass and turn-around radius in group of galaxies II: the role of dark energy
- Improved Lemaitre-Tolman model and the mass and turn-around radius in group of galaxies
- Galaxy distribution and evolution around a sample of 2dF groups