Comment on "Are the spectra of geometrical operators in Loop Quantum Gravity really discrete?" by B. Dittrich and T. Thiemann
arXiv:0708.2481
Abstract
I argue that the prediction of physical discreteness at the Planck scale in loop gravity is a reasonable conclusion that derives from a sensible ensemble of hypotheses, in spite of some contrary arguments considered in an interesting recent paper by Dittrich and Thiemann. The counter-example presented by Dittrich and Thiemann illustrates a pathology which does not seem to be present in gravity. I also point out a common confusion between two distinct frameworks for the interpretation of general-covariant quantum theory, and observe that within one of these, the derivation of physical discreteness is immediate, and not in contradiction with gauge invariance.
6 pages, 1 figure
References in corpus (5)
Cited by in corpus (18)
- Algebraic Quantum Gravity (AQG) IV. Reduced Phase Space Quantisation of Loop Quantum Gravity
- Relational Observables in Gravity: a Review
- The length operator in Loop Quantum Gravity
- Coarse graining methods for spin net and spin foam models
- Critical Overview of Loops and Foams
- The Thiemann Complexifier and the CVH algebra for Classical and Quantum FLRW Cosmology
- A model for the motion of a particle in a quantum background
- Loop Quantum Gravity Phenomenology: Linking Loops to Observational Physics
- Coherent states, constraint classes, and area operators in the new spin-foam models
- Diffeomorphism symmetry in quantum gravity models
- Emergent Braided Matter of Quantum Geometry
- Combinatorial quantisation of the Euclidean torus universe
- The scaling of black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity
- The Gibbs paradox, Black hole entropy and the thermodynamics of isolated horizons
- -Epistemic Quantum Cosmology?
- Partial Observables in Extended Systems
- Spacetime Quanta? : The Discrete Spectrum of a Quantum Spacetime Four-Volume Operator in Unimodular Loop Quantum Cosmology
- Loop quantum gravity - a short review