Parametrizations of triaxial deformation and E2 transitions of the wobbling band

Abstract

By the very definition the triaxial deformation parameter $\gamma$ is related to the expectation values of the K=0 and K=2 components of the intrinsic quadrupole tensor operator. On the other hand, using the same symbol "$\gamma$", various different parametrizations of triaxial deformation have been employed, which are suitable for various types of the mean-field potentials. It is pointed out that the values of various "$\gamma$" are quite different for the same actual triaxial deformation, especially for the large deformation; for example, the difference can be almost a factor two for the case of the triaxial superdeformed bands recently observed in the Hf and Lu nuclei. In our previous work, we have studied the wobbling band in Lu nuclei by using the microscopic framework of the cranked Nilsson mean-field and the random phase approximation, where the most serious problem is that the calculated B(E2) value is about factor two smaller. It is shown that the origin of this underestimation can be mainly attributed to the small triaxial deformation; if is used the same triaxial deformation as in the analysis of the particle-rotor model, the calculated B(E2) increases and gives correct magnitude compared with the experimental data.

10 pages, 9 figures

References in corpus (1)

• Microscopic Description of Nuclear Wobbling Motion -- Rotation of traxially deformed nuclei --

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Two-dimensional collective Hamiltonian for chiral and wobbling modes
• Collective Hamiltonian for wobbling modes
• Wobbling motion in ${}^{135}$Pr within a collective Hamiltonian
• $g$-factor and static quadrupole moment of ${}^{135}$Pr, ${}^{105}$Pd, and ${}^{187}$Au in wobbling motion
• Wobbling geometry in simple triaxial rotor
• Influence of moments of inertia on transverse wobbling mode in odd-mass nuclei
• Interpretation of normal-deformed bands in 167Lu