Two novel approaches for photometric redshift estimation based on SDSS and 2MASS databases
arXiv:0707.2250 · doi:10.1088/1009-9271/8/1/13
Abstract
We investigate two training-set methods: support vector machines (SVMs) and Kernel Regression (KR) for photometric redshift estimation with the data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 5 and Two Micron All Sky Survey databases. We probe the performances of SVMs and KR for different input patterns. Our experiments show that the more parameters considered, the accuracy doesn't always increase, and only when appropriate parameters chosen, the accuracy can improve. Moreover for different approaches, the best input pattern is different. With different parameters as input, the optimal bandwidth is dissimilar for KR. The rms errors of photometric redshifts based on SVM and KR methods are less than 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. Finally the strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches are summarized. Compared to other methods of estimating photometric redshifts, they show their superiorities, especially KR, in terms of accuracy.
accepted for publication in ChJAA
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Robust Machine Learning Applied to Astronomical Datasets III: Probabilistic Photometric Redshifts for Galaxies and Quasars in the SDSS and GALEX
- New Approaches To Photometric Redshift Prediction Via Gaussian Process Regression In The Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- Morphology Classification and Photometric Redshift Measurement of Galaxies
- Scientific Data Mining in Astronomy
- Machine learning techniques for astrophysical modelling and photometric redshift estimation of quasars in optical sky surveys