output
19962026
most citedPhenomenology of fully many-body-localized systems

964 citations

Showing math.LOShow all

22 papers · 1 filter

math.LO2020★ 4 cited

Iteration theorems for subversions of forcing classes

Gunter Fuchs, Corey Bacal Switzer

We prove various iteration theorems for forcing classes related to subproper and subcomplete forcing, introduced by Jensen. In the first part, we use revised countable support iter…

math.LO2020★ 5 cited

Separating diagonal stationary reflection principles

Gunter Fuchs, Chris Lambie-Hanson

We introduce three families of diagonal reflection principles for matrices of stationary sets of ordinals. We analyze both their relationships among themselves and their relationsh…

math.LO2020★ 6 cited

Aronszajn tree preservation and bounded forcing axioms

Gunter Fuchs

I investigate the relationships between three hierarchies of reflection principles for a forcing class : the hierarchy of bounded forcing axioms, of -absoluteness and of…

math.LO2017★ 6 cited

Inner-model reflection principles

Neil Barton, Andrés Eduardo Caicedo, Gunter Fuchs +3

We introduce and consider the inner-model reflection principle, which asserts that whenever a statement in the first-order language of set theory is true in the set-theoreti…

math.LO2017★ 1 cited

A model of the generic Vopěnka principle in which the ordinals are not Mahlo

Victoria Gitman, Joel David Hamkins

The generic Vopěnka principle, we prove, is relatively consistent with the ordinals being non-Mahlo. Similarly, the generic Vopěnka scheme is relatively consistent with the ordinal…

math.LO2017

Computable quotient presentations of models of arithmetic and set theory

Michał Tomasz Godziszewski, Joel David Hamkins

We prove various extensions of the Tennenbaum phenomenon to the case of computable quotient presentations of models of arithmetic and set theory. Specifically, no nonstandard model…

math.LO2016★ 18 cited

Small Forcing Makes Any Cardinal Superdestructible

Joel David Hamkins

Small forcing always ruins the indestructibility of an indestructible supercompact cardinal. In fact, after small forcing, any cardinal becomes superdestructible---any further…

math.LO2016★ 30 cited

Destruction or Preservation As You Like It

Joel David Hamkins

The Gap Forcing Theorem, a key contribution of this paper, implies essentially that after any reverse Easton iteration of closed forcing, such as the Laver preparation, every super…

math.LO2016

Set-theoretic mereology

Joel David Hamkins, Makoto Kikuchi

We consider a set-theoretic version of mereology based on the inclusion relation and analyze how well it might serve as a foundation of mathematics. After establishing…

math.LO2014

Large cardinals need not be large in HOD

Yong Cheng, Sy-David Friedman, Joel David Hamkins

We prove that large cardinals need not generally exhibit their large cardinal nature in HOD. For example, a supercompact cardinal need not be weakly compact in HOD, and there c…

math.LO2013★ 1 cited

Resurrection axioms and uplifting cardinals

Joel David Hamkins, Thomas A. Johnstone

We introduce the resurrection axioms, a new class of forcing axioms, and the uplifting cardinals, a new large cardinal notion, and prove that various instances of the resurrection…

math.LO2012

Moving up and down in the generic multiverse

Joel David Hamkins, Benedikt Löwe

We give a brief account of the modal logic of the generic multiverse, which is a bimodal logic with operators corresponding to the relations "is a forcing extension of" and "is a g…

math.LO2012★ 2 cited

Structural connections between a forcing class and its modal logic

Joel David Hamkins, George Leibman, Benedikt Löwe

The modal logic of forcing arises when one considers a model of set theory in the context of all its forcing extensions, interpreting necessity as "in all forcing extensions" and p…

math.LO2012★ 8 cited

Every countable model of set theory embeds into its own constructible universe

Joel David Hamkins

The main theorem of this article is that every countable model of set theory M, including every well-founded model, is isomorphic to a submodel of its own constructible universe. I…

math.LO2012★ 54 cited

Is the dream solution to the continuum hypothesis attainable?

Joel David Hamkins

The dream solution of the continuum hypothesis (CH) would be a solution by which we settle the continuum hypothesis on the basis of a newly discovered fundamental principle of set…

math.LO2011★ 35 cited

The hierarchy of equivalence relations on the natural numbers under computable reducibility

Samuel Coskey, Joel David Hamkins, Russell Miller

The notion of computable reducibility between equivalence relations on the natural numbers provides a natural computable analogue of Borel reducibility. We investigate the computab…

math.LO2011★ 223 cited

The set-theoretic multiverse

Joel David Hamkins

The multiverse view in set theory, introduced and argued for in this article, is the view that there are many distinct concepts of set, each instantiated in a corresponding set-the…

math.LO2011★ 5 cited

Set-Theoretic Geology

Gunter Fuchs, Joel David Hamkins, Jonas Reitz

A ground of the universe V is a transitive proper class W subset V, such that W is a model of ZFC and V is obtained by set forcing over W, so that V = W[G] for some W-generic filte…

math.LO2011

The Rigid Relation Principle, a New Weak Choice Principle

Joel David Hamkins, Justin Palumbo

The rigid relation principle, introduced in this article, asserts that every set admits a rigid binary relation. This follows from the axiom of choice, because well-orders are rigi…

math.LO2011

Infinite time Turing machines and an application to the hierarchy of equivalence relations on the reals

Samuel Coskey, Joel David Hamkins

We describe the basic theory of infinite time Turing machines and some recent developments, including the infinite time degree theory, infinite time complexity theory, and infinite…

math.LO2003

Exactly controlling the non-supercompact strongly compact cardinals

Arthur W. Apter, Joel David Hamkins

We summarize the known methods of producing a non-supercompact strongly compact cardinal and describe some new variants. Our Main Theorem shows how to apply these methods to many c…

math.LO1997

Changing the heights of automorphism towers

Joel David Hamkins, Simon Thomas

If is a centreless group, then denotes the height of the automorphism tower of . We prove that it is consistent that for every cardinal and every ordinal ,…