output
20192025
most citedPeer review vs bibliometrics: which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?

45 citations

researchers with a paper here

Counting papers with at most 25 authors, so collaboration author lists do not stand in for the people here.

collaborating institutions

4 papers

cs.AI2025

The Belief-Desire-Intention Ontology for modelling mental reality and agency

Sara Zuppiroli, Carmelo Fabio Longo, Anna Sofia Lippolis +6

The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model is a cornerstone for representing rational agency in artificial intelligence and cognitive sciences. Yet, its integration into structured, s…

econ.GN2023★ 15 cited

Gender Segregation: Analysis across Sectoral-Dominance in the UK Labour Market

Riccardo Leoncini, Mariele Macaluso, Annalivia Polselli

This paper aims to evaluate how changing patterns of sectoral gender segregation play a role in accounting for women's employment contracts and wages in the UK between 2005 and 202…

econ.EM2020★ 1 cited

Optimal Policy Learning: From Theory to Practice

Giovanni Cerulli

Following in the footsteps of the literature on empirical welfare maximization, this paper wants to contribute by stressing the policymaker perspective via a practical illustration…

cs.DL2019★ 45 cited

Peer review vs bibliometrics: which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?

Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Emanuela Reale

In this work, we try to answer the question of which method, peer review vs bibliometrics, better predicts the future overall scholarly impact of scientific publications. We measur…