160 citations
Counting papers with at most 25 authors, so collaboration author lists do not stand in for the people here.
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu KielDE9 papers
- GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesDE8 papers
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research KielDE2 papers
- Heinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDE2 papers
- Université de MontréalCA2 papers
- Université du Québec à MontréalCA2 papers
- University of GöttingenDE2 papers
- University of WolverhamptonGB2 papers
- Central European University - Budapest Campus1 paper
- Complexity Science HubAT1 paper
- Hasso Plattner InstituteDE1 paper
- Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften KielDE1 paper
18 papers
KARAMEL: Knowledge-Aware Ranking for Multimodal Entity Linking in the Arts via Heterogeneous Graphs
Raffaele Scaringi, Alejandro Sierra-Múnera, Gennaro Vessio +2
Discovering and disambiguating entities from multimodal and heterogeneous data is a key challenge in discovery science, where relevant knowledge is often implicit and distributed a…
Evaluation of a Provenance Management Tool for Immersive Virtual Fieldwork
Armin Bernstetter, Tom Kwasnitschka, Isabella Peters
Ensuring reproducibility of research is an integral part of good scientific practice. One way to support this is through provenance: information about research workflows from data…
Virtual Fieldwork in Immersive Environments using Game Engines
Armin Bernstetter, Tom Kwasnitschka, Jens Karstens +2
Fieldwork still is the first and foremost source of insight in many disciplines of the geosciences. Virtual fieldwork is an approach meant to enable scientists trained in fieldwork…
Scientific discourse on YouTube: Motivations for citing research in comments
Sören Striewski, Olga Zagovora, Isabella Peters
YouTube is a valuable source of user-generated content on a wide range of topics, and it encourages user participation through the use of a comment system. Video content is increas…
The Emergence of Preprints: Comparing Publishing Behaviour in the Global South and the Global North
Kristin Biesenbender, Nina Smirnova, Philipp Mayr +1
Purpose: The recent proliferation of preprints could be a way for researchers worldwide to increase the availability and visibility of their research findings. Against the backgrou…
Which Factors are associated with Open Access Publishing? A Springer Nature Case Study
Fakhri Momeni, Stefan Dietze, Philipp Mayr +2
Open Access (OA) facilitates access to articles. But, authors or funders often must pay the publishing costs preventing authors who do not receive financial support from participat…
The many facets of academic mobility and its impact on scholars' career
Fakhri Momeni, Fariba Karimi, Philipp Mayr +2
International mobility in academia can enhance the human and social capital of researchers and consequently their scientific outcome. However, there is still a very limited underst…
No Deal: Investigating the Influence of Restricted Access to Elsevier Journals on German Researchers' Publishing and Citing Behaviours
Nicholas Fraser, Anne Hobert, Najko Jahn +2
In 2014, a union of German research organisations established Projekt DEAL, a national-level project to negotiate licensing agreements with large scientific publishers. Negotiation…
What happens when a journal converts to Open Access? A bibliometric analysis
Fakhri Momeni, Philipp Mayr, Nicholas Fraser +1
In recent years, increased stakeholder pressure to transition research to Open Access has led to many journals converting, or 'flipping', from a closed access (CA) to an open acces…
Multi-Modal Adversarial Autoencoders for Recommendations of Citations and Subject Labels
Lukas Galke, Florian Mai, Iacopo Vagliano +1
We present multi-modal adversarial autoencoders for recommendation and evaluate them on two different tasks: citation recommendation and subject label recommendation. We analyze th…
What increases (social) media attention: Research impact, author prominence or title attractiveness?
Olga Zagovora, Katrin Weller, Milan Janosov +2
Do only major scientific breakthroughs hit the news and social media, or does a 'catchy' title help to attract public attention? How strong is the connection between the importance…
Content-Based Quality Estimation for Automatic Subject Indexing of Short Texts under Precision and Recall Constraints
Martin Toepfer, Christin Seifert
Semantic annotations have to satisfy quality constraints to be useful for digital libraries, which is particularly challenging on large and diverse datasets. Confidence scores of m…
Can We Count on Social Media Metrics? First Insights into the Active Scholarly Use of Social Media
Maryam Mehrazar, Christoph Carl Kling, Steffen Lemke +2
Measuring research impact is important for ranking publications in academic search engines and for research evaluation. Social media metrics or altmetrics measure the impact of sci…
Using Titles vs. Full-text as Source for Automated Semantic Document Annotation
Lukas Galke, Florian Mai, Alan Schelten +2
A significant part of the largest Knowledge Graph today, the Linked Open Data cloud, consists of metadata about documents such as publications, news reports, and other media articl…
Profiling vs. Time vs. Content: What does Matter for Top-k Publication Recommendation based on Twitter Profiles? - An Extended Technical Report
Chifumi Nishioka, Ansgar Scherp
So far it is unclear how different factors of a scientific publication recommender system based on users' tweets have an influence on the recommendation performance. We examine thr…
Query Expansion for Survey Question Retrieval in the Social Sciences
Nadine Dulisch, Andreas Oskar Kempf, Philipp Schaer
In recent years, the importance of research data and the need to archive and to share it in the scientific community have increased enormously. This introduces a whole new set of c…
Astrophysicists on Twitter: An in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behavior
Stefanie Haustein, Timothy D. Bowman, Kim Holmberg +2
This paper analyzes the tweeting behavior of 37 astrophysicists on Twitter and compares their tweeting behavior with their publication behavior and citation impact to show whether…
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
Stefanie Haustein, Vincent Larivière, Mike Thelwall +2
A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley. While Twitter is a microblogging plat…