papers

Publications (19)

cs.CR2018

Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectors

Kevin Eykholt, Ivan Evtimov, Earlence Fernandes +6

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples-maliciously crafted inputs that cause DNNs to make incorrect predictions. Recent work has shown that these attack…

cs.LG2020

On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defenses

Florian Tramer, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel +1

Adaptive attacks have (rightfully) become the de facto standard for evaluating defenses to adversarial examples. We find, however, that typical adaptive evaluations are incomplete.…

cs.LG2022

The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative

Nicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Chiyuan Zhang +3

Machine learning models trained on private datasets have been shown to leak their private data. While recent work has found that the average data point is rarely leaked, the outlie…

cs.CR2021

Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks

Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Florian Tramer, Nicholas Carlini +1

Membership inference attacks are one of the simplest forms of privacy leakage for machine learning models: given a data point and model, determine whether the point was used to tra…

cs.LG2024

Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models

Usman Anwar, Abulhair Saparov, Javier Rando +39

This work identifies 18 foundational challenges in assuring the alignment and safety of large language models (LLMs). These challenges are organized into three different categories…

cs.CR2021

Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models

Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramer, Eric Wallace +9

It has become common to publish large (billion parameter) language models that have been trained on private datasets. This paper demonstrates that in such settings, an adversary ca…

cs.CR2024

JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models

Patrick Chao, Edoardo Debenedetti, Alexander Robey +9

Jailbreak attacks cause large language models (LLMs) to generate harmful, unethical, or otherwise objectionable content. Evaluating these attacks presents a number of challenges, w…

cs.CR2022

Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles

Nicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr +3

A membership inference attack allows an adversary to query a trained machine learning model to predict whether or not a particular example was contained in the model's training dat…

cs.CR2021

Is Private Learning Possible with Instance Encoding?

Nicholas Carlini, Samuel Deng, Sanjam Garg +6

A private machine learning algorithm hides as much as possible about its training data while still preserving accuracy. In this work, we study whether a non-private learning algori…

cs.CR2018

Note on Attacking Object Detectors with Adversarial Stickers

Kevin Eykholt, Ivan Evtimov, Earlence Fernandes +6

Deep learning has proven to be a powerful tool for computer vision and has seen widespread adoption for numerous tasks. However, deep learning algorithms are known to be vulnerable…

cs.LG2025

Exploring and Mitigating Adversarial Manipulation of Voting-Based Leaderboards

Yangsibo Huang, Milad Nasr, Anastasios Angelopoulos +10

It is now common to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) by having humans manually vote to evaluate model outputs, in contrast to typical benchmarks that evaluate knowledge or ski…

cs.LG2023

Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models

Nicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski +3

Large language models (LMs) have been shown to memorize parts of their training data, and when prompted appropriately, they will emit the memorized training data verbatim. This is…

cs.LG2022

Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditing

Florian Tramer, Andreas Terzis, Thomas Steinke +3

Differential Privacy can provide provable privacy guarantees for training data in machine learning. However, the presence of proofs does not preclude the presence of errors. Inspir…

cs.CR2020

SquirRL: Automating Attack Analysis on Blockchain Incentive Mechanisms with Deep Reinforcement Learning

Charlie Hou, Mingxun Zhou, Yan Ji +4

Incentive mechanisms are central to the functionality of permissionless blockchains: they incentivize participants to run and secure the underlying consensus protocol. Designing in…

cs.LG2023

(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!

Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramer, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham +3

In this paper we show how to achieve state-of-the-art certified adversarial robustness to 2-norm bounded perturbations by relying exclusively on off-the-shelf pretrained models. To…

cs.LG2022

Increasing Confidence in Adversarial Robustness Evaluations

Roland S. Zimmermann, Wieland Brendel, Florian Tramer +1

Hundreds of defenses have been proposed to make deep neural networks robust against minimal (adversarial) input perturbations. However, only a handful of these defenses held up the…

cs.CR2025

SoK: Watermarking for AI-Generated Content

Xuandong Zhao, Sam Gunn, Miranda Christ +11

As the outputs of generative AI (GenAI) techniques improve in quality, it becomes increasingly challenging to distinguish them from human-created content. Watermarking schemes are…

cs.CL2024

Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?

Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo +8

Large language models are now tuned to align with the goals of their creators, namely to be "helpful and harmless." These models should respond helpfully to user questions, but ref…

cs.CR2021

NeuraCrypt is not private

Nicholas Carlini, Sanjam Garg, Somesh Jha +3

NeuraCrypt (Yara et al. arXiv 2021) is an algorithm that converts a sensitive dataset to an encoded dataset so that (1) it is still possible to train machine learning models on the…